Hi Nimitz, do you have any experience with the Hush player estimator algorithm. He pretty much nailed it - at least before the big change in YS and stadium boosted the ai and training potential.

/8

No I have not played much with the Hush player Estimator.

Ok as stated in the non-stickied post my earlier assumptions for experience was wrong. Players experience gain is tied only to ice time.

here is the spreed sheet for season 44 proving this.

http://tinyurl.com/cn6g9q9

Updated spreadsheet with season 44 stats, also you can see the effect of training drop on a lot of players.

http://tinyurl.com/7vofex6

New season is now up, more notes are on the spreadsheet. Also injuries are not exact over the season but very close if they are off it is not more than 1or 2 games. The way the game keeps track of injuries is a little off, example if you get injured during a game for 2 matches. The game it only counts it as one even if you missed two training sessions.

http://tinyurl.com/7vofex6

Here are some of the things you can see.

Biggest change was playing 3 lines instead of 4 on friendlies as you can see the 3rd line benefited the most from this. Did not record much on the subs this season might try later and back track the info but I only have 2 left.

Look at Emanuel Telek if you want to see what moving an older guy from the 3rd to 1st line does. Also this player made me earn about the darn 90 day buyback rule. OUCH!!

I had one 1st line player(Michal Tomola ) injured for 25 games total this season. His main sub Milan Berger(sold due to sleeping and -3) gained 7 extra exp , also and the damage it did to his season.

You can also see the gains a 1st line player(Patrice Angell) got from being put back on friendlies.

Barnaba Okoń got added to the new special lines see how that effected his season also Mikko Kant is the main player that lost ice time due to this. But he still has a lot more minutes than last season trying to figure out why.

I have added a compare page to the speadsheet, so far it is only comparing 2 players but I am hoping to add more to it soon(*tm). Will try and add more today but might get called away.

Don't worry everyone, I am still keeping all my data for my team. I am just not updating it since I am at the top level and don't want to give any extra advantage to my opponents in I.1 also I do have one player on the national team :P so hiding that info also. All will be updated when I set my rebuild.

The more I track my team the more I believe they are injury and non-injury proned players. But here is how I see it looking at my high ice time players.
1st you have the work horses that play 600-1000 minutes and never(rarely) get hurt I have 2 of those.
2nd you have the guys that get a 2-3 game injury a year
3rd you have the fragile guys that get injured 2 or 3 times a year.

My super star Aidy Crackwood has had 51 missed games to injury so that means he has missed aprox 66 training session that is almost a full season.

So far my record is a player that missed 21 games in a season about 25 training sessions.

Oh an it Takes about 4-5 season to balance out a since stat heavy player you get as 21yr

How is calculate the training session. Because my trainaing center its 85% and my player with the most training its 35%. Somebody can tell me what its that. Its a bug our something like that.

jtl33 18:50:10, 25.08.13 How is calculate the training session. Because my trainaing center its 85% and my player with the most training its 35%. Somebody can tell me what its that. Its a bug our something like that.

1. You should always build your Training and Regeneration facility's equally that way your players will always regain 100% energy after the game and training.
2. Your player training greatly depends on the Quality and Potential of the player. Meaning...a player with 90+Q at 27yrs old and Potential of 18 or less will on train about 10-15% for a league game with T+R at 85/85. Meanwhile a player with 90+Q at say 18yrs old and Potential of 65-88 will train at 35-40% for a league game. Both those examples are assumed that BOTH players would be playing at least 28 minutes for said league game. Bench players will not train as well as a player who gets game time. The younger the players (with high Q+P) the more ice time they should get and their training will increase.

I'm noticing in my own spreadsheet that a player's form influences their training level. My sample size is pretty small, but it looks like a player with 100 form will train roughly 8% better than one with 0 form.

smozoma 23:14:16, 30.08.13 I'm noticing in my own spreadsheet that a player's form influences their training level. My sample size is pretty small, but it looks like a player with 100 form will train roughly 8% better than one with 0 form.

That is completely false.

I will bite the bullet and update at the end of this season it will have all the stats for the seasons I am missing. Also It might be a day or so late since I have been building my cabin for the last month, and next week I should be finishing the exterior shell.

Updated sheet, don't forget to check the player compare page ya only one set of players, but one day I will add more info just busy building my cabin before winter sets in.

http://tinyurl.com/7vofex6

Notes
Ice time dropped on all players because the game does not add playout games to ice time, but it does add playoff games ice-time to players totals.

If any numbers don't make sense ask me I might of typed a number wrong.

Updated for season 50 and 51 sorry it is a little late

http://tinyurl.com/7vofex6

Nimitz 17:59:19, 21.09.12 No I have not played much with the Hush player Estimator.

Ok as stated in the non-stickied post my earlier assumptions for experience was wrong. Players experience gain is tied only to ice time.

here is the spreed sheet for season 44 proving this.

<a href="http://www.hockeyarena.net/public_redirect.php?http://tinyurl.com/cn6g9q9" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/cn6g9q9</a>

jetsdude|HA jetsdude

Does anyone use this thread anymore? I'm not sure the data is relevant after the changes that have occurred over the past few years.

jetsdude 15:37:56, 14.01.21 Does anyone use this thread anymore? I'm not sure the data is relevant after the changes that have occurred over the past few years.

I was kind of confused. Maybe bumping it after 7 years wasn't a good idea.